Editorial endorsement May 2026: Elect Pam Treece as Washington County chair

Read The Oregonian article here

By 

Key employers in Washington County have cut thousands of high-paying jobs in the past few years. Community resistance to growth — both for residential and business purposes — has spurred thorny conflicts. The county’s expenses continue to outpace revenue, leading to years of budget cuts. 

To top it all off, the outgoing chair of the board of commissioners — criticized over the years for “inappropriate” conduct and allegedly bullying employees — leaves a county government hungry for steady, professional leadership. 

Of the three people running for board chair, District 2 Commissioner Pam Treece is voters’ best pick to provide the disciplined direction, countywide perspective and expertise that the county needs.

Treece, 74, who previously helmed the Westside Economic Alliance after a career as a PacifiCorp executive and public school teacher, joined the board of commissioners in 2019, representing the area spanning Helvetia to West Slope. 
 

Her two terms of experience helping lead the county through some of its most challenging years came through in the endorsement interview. She consistently answered questions with a level of detail and nuance that distinguished her from her opponents and reflected her command of county operations, familiarity with its finances and ability to identify ways of navigating conflicts.

Her priority, she said, is to ensure economic stability and grow opportunities for Washington County residents. That will require working with state agencies to align their regulatory expectations with prompt permitting timelines; working with cities to understand both their concerns about growth and how they match up with they want to provide their residents; and leading a “cultural change” at the county that results in employees bringing more of a customer-service focus to make permitting and other processes more efficient.

Her ability to dissect conflicts and identify the legitimate concerns among competing parties is an underestimated skill for fashioning true solutions. It’s easy to reflexively adopt a hardline stance without consideration of the consequences. But Treece delves into those complexities, whether it’s breaking down the economic impact of data centers to how cities’ resistance to growth affects their ability to fund public services or attract amenities. Her endorsement by the current mayors of nearly every city in the county reflects a strength of relationships that the chair will need.

Her opponents are fellow commissioner Nafisa Fai, 48, a former public health official who has represented District 1 since 2021, and Jenny Kamprath, 64, an advertising sales director. The winning candidate must receive more than half the vote in order to avoid a runoff in November.

Fai’s priorities include cutting barriers for small businesses, promoting affordability and making the county welcoming for all. She wants the county to look more deeply at new approaches that can “reimagine” how housing is financed, for instance, or for meeting revenue needs. But her responses lacked the level of detail and context that show she can take charge from day one. With two more years on the county board in her current seat, Fai can hone her proposals and continue emphasizing the needs of everyday county residents in guiding the county’s direction. 

Kamprath makes legitimate criticisms of the county’s ever-increasing spending with budget cuts despite the passage of new taxes. But her focus on cutting spending doesn’t come with a broader vision of how she would spark economic growth or manage the many conflicts that the board chair will navigate.

While Treece remains the best candidate, Washington County residents should recognize where she, as well as Fai and the other members of the board, have fallen short of their obligations to the public, and press for improvements.

The first is in their lackluster oversight as board members of Clean Water Services, the county’s sewer agency. An investigation by The Oregonian/OregonLive uncovered excessive spending by the agency’s leadership that went unchecked and has since prompted changes in how closely the agency is scrutinized. Both Treece and Fai acknowledged the insufficient attention with Treece committing to better response to public records requests as well.
 
The second is in their baffling approval last year of a significant change in employee benefits as part of adopting the 2025-26 budget. The county has decided it will start paying nearly all county employees’ mandatory contribution to their pension plans. That’s in addition to the employer’s portion that the county already pays. The county previously paid the “6% pickup” only for sheriff’s deputies, in accordance with that union contract.
 
Taking on the employees’ contribution to the Public Employees Retirement System is costing the county an additional $6.3 million this year over the $7.8 million already allotted for cost-of-living raises (which are being used this year to help cover the 6% pickup). But that means the county will likely face even higher commitments in future years as it covers both the pickup and cost-of-living increases. What public agency in Oregon restructures their employee compensation to increase its PERS obligations — likely cutting more deeply into the public services that the agency can provide?
 
Both actions are knocks on the entire board of commissioners, and a reminder to taxpayers they can hold public officials accountable throughout the year by asking questions — not just waiting for the next election.
 
But none of that should stop voters from giving their support to Treece, who emerges as the strongest candidate to lead the county through today’s turmoil.

 

-The Oregonian/OregonLive Editorial Board